I largely agree with these recommendations. I doubt if there’s been any serious discussion with OMB about NASA.
One thought on “Reforming NASA”
I’m in general agreement too – at least with much of the piece. But leading off with all the pearl-clutchery about the size of proposed cuts and then following that by, in essence, making a case for cuts of exactly such a magnitude seems a bit – odd. It certainly doesn’t suggest any cohesive co-authorship. What it does suggest is three parts written in isolation and pasted together at the last minute before publication. It further suggests that whoever wrote the first part is not on the same page as the authors of the rest.
I’m in general agreement too – at least with much of the piece. But leading off with all the pearl-clutchery about the size of proposed cuts and then following that by, in essence, making a case for cuts of exactly such a magnitude seems a bit – odd. It certainly doesn’t suggest any cohesive co-authorship. What it does suggest is three parts written in isolation and pasted together at the last minute before publication. It further suggests that whoever wrote the first part is not on the same page as the authors of the rest.