6 thoughts on “Thoughts On Social Trust”

1. Should Trump “beat the cheat”, it’s nice to see that his designated successor is not and insurance policy like Biden and Harris*. In some ways, Vance is reverse insurance, telling the Dems that should they cut back on the assassination attempts.

   * And yet we still got Biden and appear about to get Harris.

2. I listened to half his Rogan discussion. He’s clearly a sharp guy and a good communicator with a down to earth persona. I know some question his true stance, but I’m cautiously optimistic after hearing him.

   Rogan’s free-wheeling three hour conversations with people like Trump and Rogan are better ways to get down past the practiced sound-bites to get a real feel for candidates. It is vastly more informative than the usual presidential debates.

   1. He is a sharp guy and good communicator, but more than that he simply works hard. He treats activities that he’s involved in like they’re exams that should be crammed for so he can ace them. Really a sensible and straight-forward approach that so few people embrace anymore.

3. Social Trust requires commonality of values and cultural identity. In a multicultural society, that commonality disappears, and with it goes the trust based on having a good idea of how everyone will act in a given situation.

   Diversity is poison.

   1. Diversity of most kinds is fine. Multiculturalism – i.e., a diversity of cultures – is poison.

4. Nate Silver thinks Vance was the worst decision Trump has made, like how could he be so stupid? Vance, ewww

Comments are closed.