Sending Humans Into Space

A professor says to stop doing it, because it’s “imperialist.”

I do sort of agree with this, though: “Mandel said the space industry is ‘highly bureaucratic, highly politicized, and highly technical,’ and the more she learned the more she began to question the utility of continued manned space operations.”

She’s not wrong about that; I question its utility, the way NASA continues to go about it. It certainly doesn’t seem worth the money to me. But that’s a separate issue from SpaceX’s methods and goals which, unlike the government human-spaceflight program, which is run primarily as a jobs program, are focused on actually moving humanity into space in a serious way. But she seems to be damning all of human spaceflight with the bad example set by NASA. And I’m sure that she thinks that Elon is even more “imperialist” than NASA.

[Late-morning update]

Don’t be a puddlefish:

5 thoughts on “Sending Humans Into Space”

  1. She’s a PhD candidate and “outer space anthropologist”. And arguing against sending people to space. Which would mean there would be no anthropes to logy.

  2. That sounds like a made up degree on the order of cryptozoology and exobiology. They have nothing to actually study so they just make up things to sound academic.

  3. It seems if NASA wanted to send people in space, they should have done some work related to artificial gravity. And it should start with lunar and Mars level artificial gravity.
    Or find the lowest threshold of how much artificial gravity is needed.
    But in terms lunar crew exploration, one does not need artificial gravity to “work”, but the plan is explore the Moon and then explore Mars. And Mars exploration, probably needs some understanding of making artificial gravity, work.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *