2 thoughts on “Leftist Supreme Court “Journalists””
What?? More propaganda and oxymoron “advocacy journalism”??
My shocked face!!
“They also need to do a lot of grisly stories about people who are “victims” of the court’s decisions, particularly women harmed by the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Also, when it comes to conservatives and Christians, the new journalistic model calls not for empathy and insightful coverage, but all-out antipathy.”
Almost as if it were on cue, Arse Technica’s right out of the gate, with an article published a few days ago titled something like “how many people will recent Supreme Court decisions kill”.
What’shisname who posts the otherwise-good rocket report there should be ashamed of himself for not leaving, unless he’s actually idiologically one of them, in which case he should just be ashamed of himself.
What?? More propaganda and oxymoron “advocacy journalism”??
My shocked face!!
“They also need to do a lot of grisly stories about people who are “victims” of the court’s decisions, particularly women harmed by the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Also, when it comes to conservatives and Christians, the new journalistic model calls not for empathy and insightful coverage, but all-out antipathy.”
Almost as if it were on cue, Arse Technica’s right out of the gate, with an article published a few days ago titled something like “how many people will recent Supreme Court decisions kill”.
What’shisname who posts the otherwise-good rocket report there should be ashamed of himself for not leaving, unless he’s actually idiologically one of them, in which case he should just be ashamed of himself.