On the subject of free speech and freedom of expression, the NBA has found a new merchandising opportunity: sale of Lakers Number 23 jerseys to Hong Kong protesters.
“It so boggles the mind that I have to hope you are simply not fully aware of what your company is doing.”
If only Stalin knew what was going on!
Heh.
Brin will certainly be taken aback when he does his daily perusal of PJMedia.
“We have no desire to see government intervene in private business to protect free speech. But your company has availed itself of protections under law that shield it from liability for defamation, copyright infringement, etc.”
Even if this was an entirely accurate portrayal of the “Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act” thing, it still is a specious argument, as one thing (being “shielded”) has absolutely nothing to do with the other (restricting some videos). Prager is not helping his (already week) argument by constantly bringing it up.
On the subject of free speech and freedom of expression, the NBA has found a new merchandising opportunity: sale of Lakers Number 23 jerseys to Hong Kong protesters.
https://www.tmz.com/2019/10/14/lebron-james-daryl-morey-china-nba/
“It so boggles the mind that I have to hope you are simply not fully aware of what your company is doing.”
If only Stalin knew what was going on!
Heh.
Brin will certainly be taken aback when he does his daily perusal of PJMedia.
“We have no desire to see government intervene in private business to protect free speech. But your company has availed itself of protections under law that shield it from liability for defamation, copyright infringement, etc.”
Even if this was an entirely accurate portrayal of the “Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act” thing, it still is a specious argument, as one thing (being “shielded”) has absolutely nothing to do with the other (restricting some videos). Prager is not helping his (already week) argument by constantly bringing it up.