A major blow for free speech in academia in Australia. And yes, there should be consequences for people who do this sort of thing.
8 thoughts on “Making The Barrier Reef Great Again”
Comments are closed.
A major blow for free speech in academia in Australia. And yes, there should be consequences for people who do this sort of thing.
Comments are closed.
I’m getting a “subscription required” error at that URL, but this appears to be about the same story:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/apr/16/james-cook-university-professor-peter-ridds-sacking-ruled-unlawful
Yes, that’s it.
Or this one at the Australian Broadcasting Corp.
There have been recent studies from James Cook university on how resilient corals actually are. After a bleaching event, corals and their symbiotes return with even more temperature tolerance. Phys.org blather that says there’s “a glimmer of hope”. Seriously, that’s in the title.
The KT extinction event couldn’t kill those suckers. Cretaceous temperatures couldn’t kill them. The ice ages couldn’t kill them. Twenty three nuclear bombs totaling over 42 megatons on Bikini Atoll couldn’t kill them. Not even the great dying of the Permian-Triassic extinction managed to kill them, with reefs recovering faster than most of the rest of the ecosystem. Science Daily article on reef recovery after the Permian-Triassic extinction, which further illustrates how deep the academic mind rot goes with this paragraph:
Sixth mass extinction? In all likelihood? Really? An Islamic science journal would be embarrassed to drip with so much overt dogma and nonsense. They remind me of early scientific papers which would take some observations, toss in some basic math, and then go off on some tangent about how it reveals that God’s divine hand is ready to smite us all.
Funny how no one every comes up with the hypothesis that one species of dinosaurs became intelligent, and wiped out all the others. I was always hoping that we’d find remnants of some of their lunar probes on the moon, even after 66 million years. (Would definitely be a different sort of resolution to the so-called Fermi Paradox…)
Then again, Gary Larson comes close.
That’s the cartoon I always envision when I read about the demise of the dinosaurs!
I have to admit that your idea is enticing, though. I wonder if Michael Crichton had it in mind when, somewhere in the Jurassic book franchise, one of his characters insisted that it was not a catastrophe that ended the dinosaurs – it was a change in their behavior.
This reef marine science stuff was once labelled by Australian journalist Tim Blair as “green collar crime”. Sounds about right. They have some nice resorts on islands and get to mess about in boats in tropical waters with female graduate students in bikinis, while virtue signalling, all at taxpayers’ expense.
So, the judge didn’t rule on motive for why the rules were abused, just that the rules were abused. That is not quite the defense the Guardian trumpets it as.
Unrelated: Space.com story
That’s all the detail there is, which is pretty vague, but it does indicate that there wasn’t a hardware failure.