Here are the questions that she needs to answer under oath.

If Nunes is telling the truth—and despite a widespread effort to make him look like a liar, he’s been right so far—then this incidental collection had nothing to do with Russian collusion charges. Why has the media shown such little curiosity about the subject matter of the collection?

Yes, reporters, we know that “unmasking” is legal. So is meeting with a Russian ambassador during a campaign. And no, it does not vindicate Trump’s tweet. Stressing the legality of the unmasking is a way to distract from the real questions: Did Rice abuse her power? Who did she share it with? Why? Did those people then leak the information for political purposes? That is illegal.

That will be pretty challenging for her, given that she seems to be as big a congenital liar as Hillary Clinton.

[Update a few minutes later]

Sorry, Democrats, the Obama-spying scandal isn’t going away.

Nope. Sessions recused himself from the Russia investigation. He didn’t recuse himself from this.