There’s also the hypocrisy (not, of course, Hillary’s alone) of being against the Second Amendment while one’s personal safety is protected by a phalanx of gunmen.
Poors that can protect themselves are less susceptible to control through Democrat mob violence.
Can someone here who knows the nitty-gritty details of emailgate tell me if there is any evidence that any State Department staff members (Diplomatic Security, IT, document retention compliance officers, etc.) specifically brought up the issue of HRC’s use of a personal email account for SD business to their supervisors during her tenure as SecState? Her practice was well known at the time, right? Shouldn’t that have raised red flags then, as it was happening?
Thanks for that link wodun. Interesting that the “top level IT official” who falsely claimed that her private email use had been cleared by legal staff didn’t get in trouble.
But why would anyone think that she would know about a message sent from her email to State Department staff?
Hillary isn’t a person, she is a group of people. Just look at her Twitter. She can’t tweet on her own. She has a group of people tweet under her name. She did the same thing at State. All of her communications take place through intermediaries, which is great for keeping Hillary out of trouble.
There’s also the hypocrisy (not, of course, Hillary’s alone) of being against the Second Amendment while one’s personal safety is protected by a phalanx of gunmen.
Poors that can protect themselves are less susceptible to control through Democrat mob violence.
Can someone here who knows the nitty-gritty details of emailgate tell me if there is any evidence that any State Department staff members (Diplomatic Security, IT, document retention compliance officers, etc.) specifically brought up the issue of HRC’s use of a personal email account for SD business to their supervisors during her tenure as SecState? Her practice was well known at the time, right? Shouldn’t that have raised red flags then, as it was happening?
Everyone knew about it and people who raised concerns were told to never speak of it again. http://www.computerworld.com/article/3075347/government-it/state-dept-it-staff-told-to-keep-quiet-about-clinton-s-server.html
Thanks for that link wodun. Interesting that the “top level IT official” who falsely claimed that her private email use had been cleared by legal staff didn’t get in trouble.
But why would anyone think that she would know about a message sent from her email to State Department staff?
Hillary isn’t a person, she is a group of people. Just look at her Twitter. She can’t tweet on her own. She has a group of people tweet under her name. She did the same thing at State. All of her communications take place through intermediaries, which is great for keeping Hillary out of trouble.
This is what Hillary looks like at work.
And it doesn’t hurt to have crooked cops on the payroll.
There are people saying that the proper analogy is not “Casino” but rather “Weekend at Bernie’s.”
Little do they know that Bernie is the perpetrator of a fraud they’ve uncovered and is arranging to have them killed.
Sounds about right.