that is nuts thinking.. the more armed people the more likely a crazy is armed or just a plain accident. Like women who dropped a loaded firearm from her purse and shot someone .. or the guy at the theater screwing around with a loaded firearm and shot someone. Sooner or later someone will be killed by an untrained moron with a gun.
No, what’s nuts thinking is the notion that you can disarm law-abiding Americans.
What’s even more nuts thinking is that you can disarm those who are indifferent to the law.
and of course you did not address the issues at all. Why do I have to pay to sit in a room where some screw ball moron who is not taking his meds and decides playing with a loaded firearm is a good idea?
You take a condition where carrying a firearm is illegal so you do not know what the actual stats are for how many are actually strapped in a classroom, to where any moron can come strapped with loaded firearms and it will not increase the number of accidental deaths it just plain idiotic because we DO have the stats on how many are getting injured by idiots with firearms with the rise of people carrying.
Why do I have to drive on the road where morons from other countries don’t obey American laws and cause accidents. Why don’t they often have insurance?
Why do I have to live in cities where homeless people roam, cause crimes, spread disease and deal drugs?
Why do I have to pay to sit in a room where some screw ball moron who is not taking his meds
A) You are stigmatizing mental illness as people who are violent. This is a violation of Democrats morality code.
B) You are stereotyping people who own guns, who you are apparently bigoted against, as being both stupid and mentally ill. What if you said the same thing about Muslims, gays, or black people?
C) You make a some erroneous paranoid unsupported claims about gun accidents.
With Democrat’s open arms policy toward terrorists, we are all first responders. What are people supposed to do when a crazed Democrat, like in Dallas or Orlando, goes full jihad?
“Sooner or later someone will be killed by an untrained moron with a gun.”
So…not a person with a concealed carry license, then, because they have to go through training which is going to go over legalities and stuff.
Which is a perfect argument for mandatory gun training in our schools. Some kids don’t know enough about guns, rifles, &c to know they are dangerous and can kill you. Many haven’t seen a gun fired in real life — only on television and in movies. Let alone fired one. I remember when the Officer Friendly presentation in grade school assembly changed my perception about firearms.
” Sooner or later someone will be killed by an untrained moron with a gun.”
There’s a simple solution for that – huge fines and jail terms for people to do not take the responsibility seriously and hurt someone – someone who is not committing a crime that is.
Secondly there are hundreds of thousands of people carrying every day all over the nation and you do not hear of any events like this.
This is just fear mongering.
But even more important:
You’re doing what Democrats do: looking at one narrow – and highly negative aspect – and making that the sum total of your argument.
Until you can tell me how many people’s lives were SAVED by civilian carriers, then you simply have no argument at all. Like that guy who saved a cop’s life just recently.: the cop was losing the fist fight with a bad guy and the bad guy had him on the ground and was going for the cop’s gun. A civilian with a license to carry pulled his gun and ordered the bad guy to stop.
You are talking about Utopia because you do not take into account all aspects of gun ownership. And you are neglecting the primal concept that with freedom comes responsibility. And if you do not take that responsibility seriously you should lose the freedom.
And please do not try the argument of “Well do we have to wait until someone gets killed before people learn the penalties and start being responsible?”
That’s the argument of a 3 year old….a 3 year old who blithely accepts the 50,000 killed on the highway each year.
He will say that no one was ever saved by someone using a gun because that is the leftist narrative and they will not let their fellow leftists know of any examples lest people see through their propaganda and stop scapegoating innocents and supporting efforts to use government to punish their political opponents
that is nuts thinking.. the more armed people the more likely a crazy is armed or just a plain accident. Like women who dropped a loaded firearm from her purse and shot someone .. or the guy at the theater screwing around with a loaded firearm and shot someone. Sooner or later someone will be killed by an untrained moron with a gun.
No, what’s nuts thinking is the notion that you can disarm law-abiding Americans.
What’s even more nuts thinking is that you can disarm those who are indifferent to the law.
and of course you did not address the issues at all. Why do I have to pay to sit in a room where some screw ball moron who is not taking his meds and decides playing with a loaded firearm is a good idea?
You take a condition where carrying a firearm is illegal so you do not know what the actual stats are for how many are actually strapped in a classroom, to where any moron can come strapped with loaded firearms and it will not increase the number of accidental deaths it just plain idiotic because we DO have the stats on how many are getting injured by idiots with firearms with the rise of people carrying.
Why do I have to drive on the road where morons from other countries don’t obey American laws and cause accidents. Why don’t they often have insurance?
Why do I have to live in cities where homeless people roam, cause crimes, spread disease and deal drugs?
Why do I have to pay to sit in a room where some screw ball moron who is not taking his meds
A) You are stigmatizing mental illness as people who are violent. This is a violation of Democrats morality code.
B) You are stereotyping people who own guns, who you are apparently bigoted against, as being both stupid and mentally ill. What if you said the same thing about Muslims, gays, or black people?
C) You make a some erroneous paranoid unsupported claims about gun accidents.
With Democrat’s open arms policy toward terrorists, we are all first responders. What are people supposed to do when a crazed Democrat, like in Dallas or Orlando, goes full jihad?
“Sooner or later someone will be killed by an untrained moron with a gun.”
So…not a person with a concealed carry license, then, because they have to go through training which is going to go over legalities and stuff.
Which is a perfect argument for mandatory gun training in our schools. Some kids don’t know enough about guns, rifles, &c to know they are dangerous and can kill you. Many haven’t seen a gun fired in real life — only on television and in movies. Let alone fired one. I remember when the Officer Friendly presentation in grade school assembly changed my perception about firearms.
” Sooner or later someone will be killed by an untrained moron with a gun.”
There’s a simple solution for that – huge fines and jail terms for people to do not take the responsibility seriously and hurt someone – someone who is not committing a crime that is.
Secondly there are hundreds of thousands of people carrying every day all over the nation and you do not hear of any events like this.
This is just fear mongering.
But even more important:
You’re doing what Democrats do: looking at one narrow – and highly negative aspect – and making that the sum total of your argument.
Until you can tell me how many people’s lives were SAVED by civilian carriers, then you simply have no argument at all. Like that guy who saved a cop’s life just recently.: the cop was losing the fist fight with a bad guy and the bad guy had him on the ground and was going for the cop’s gun. A civilian with a license to carry pulled his gun and ordered the bad guy to stop.
http://www.westernjournalism.com/armed-citizen-steps-in-to-save-rookie-police-officer-from-beating/
Or like these:
http://www.sightm1911.com/lib/ccw/officer_peril.htm
You are talking about Utopia because you do not take into account all aspects of gun ownership. And you are neglecting the primal concept that with freedom comes responsibility. And if you do not take that responsibility seriously you should lose the freedom.
And please do not try the argument of “Well do we have to wait until someone gets killed before people learn the penalties and start being responsible?”
That’s the argument of a 3 year old….a 3 year old who blithely accepts the 50,000 killed on the highway each year.
He will say that no one was ever saved by someone using a gun because that is the leftist narrative and they will not let their fellow leftists know of any examples lest people see through their propaganda and stop scapegoating innocents and supporting efforts to use government to punish their political opponents