No surprise to anyone familiar with the history, since fascism is leftism.
15 thoughts on “The Left”
The Democrat party believes victim status trumps the rule of law. Transgenderes threatening Ben Shaprio; supposedly threatened women on campus; illegal immigrants, etc.
Get the press to rally and create a victimized group and voila! all laws go out the door.
What caught my attention was Oduolowu labeling Jenner rich and white, what’s race got to do with it?
As for Shapiro and Tur, He was deliberately causing offense, she retaliated with a threat that no one there, including Shapiro, took seriously. I try not to go around deliberately offending people because it can get you more than threats.
As for Shapiro and Tur, He was deliberately causing offense, she retaliated with a threat that no one there, including Shapiro, took seriously.
But she thought a physical threat to a spoken offense a perfectly appropriate response. If you agree, you just might be a fascist, too.
Well, when Buzz Aldrin punched that dickhead for calling him a fraud and a liar I was cheering Buzz, so maybe that makes me (and Aldrin) fascists in your book.
Well, you know what? If he, or she, or whatever had actually punched him out, he, or she, or whatever he or she is, might have gotten a little more respect. Instead, he, or she, or whatever, called out the fascist mob.
Nonsense, if Tur (she has a name) had actually punched Shapiro you and your Ilk would be screaming even louder.
I will try to explain it to you one more time. He was not “deliberately causing offense.” He was making a point, that one can’t simply decide on one’s own what one’s gender is, and expect everyone else to agree. As to causing offense, yes, the precious snowflake may have been offended but, while he was indifferent as to whether he or she was, that wasn’t (necessarily) his intent. But he made politically incorrect speech, and so he must be punished by the mob.
I will try to explain it to you one more time. He was not “deliberately causing offense.”
I’m pretty sure that’s the first time you’ve made that point.
During the debate Shapiro said “feelings aren’t facts”, a lot like Sheldon would if trying to argue for the application of the laws of the physical world to the human world, now with your “He was not deliberately causing offense” argument, it sounds like Shapiro’s best defense for his offensiveness is that he’s got Aspergers Well it seems to me that Tur could use the same defense, she wasn’t deliberately threatening him, she was just putting a friendly arm around him and trying to explain that she found his comment offensive and that it made her feel angry.
So maybe they’ve both got Asbergers.
it sounds like Shapiro’s best defense for his offensiveness is that he’s got Aspergers
Or (like me) he’s not willing to pervert the language merely to avoid offending someone. Someone is likely to be offended no matter what you do or say. Once you let someone being offended control your behavior, it will never end with these totalitarians, as we’ve seen on campus over the past decades.
And Tur was threatening him, and deliberately so, to intimidate him into compliance. There was nothing “friendly” about it.
It’s the faulty logic Rand displays here that’s responsible for lots of the crap in the world today, that is that physical violence is so terrible a thing to do while emotional abuse and other offensive behaviour intended to hurt the victim is fine and dandy:
A punch in the playgrounds a horrific act, but verbal abuse and cyber bullying is nothing to worry about.
Spanking a naughty child is child abuse (it’s illegal in many countries now) but parents emotionally abusing children goes under the radar.
Corporal punishment of criminals must be outlawed as cruel and inhumane, but locking them up for 10 years in an environment that’ll make them even more antisocial and violent is considered sane.
It’s the faulty logic Rand displays here that’s responsible for lots of the crap in the world today, that is that physical violence is so terrible a thing to do while emotional abuse and other offensive behaviour intended to hurt the victim is fine and dandy
Hilarious. You do realize, of course, that you will probably be one of the first the crocodile eats?
“You do realize, of course, that you will probably be one of the first the crocodile eats?”
“Liberals” (and by “liberals” I mean of course “tax-happy, coercion-addicted, power-tripping State fellators”) never do. In fact, they never seem to get that the crocodile eats anyone. They all seem to delude themselves that Big Brother will somehow spare them,
We used to say, “sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me.” That’s still true. The only power words have over you is the power you lend them.
But, I agree with your last paragraph.
No, I shoot crocodiles, I’m the one who isn’t crying about violence here.
“Nothing outside the State, everything for the State, nothing against the State.”
“We’ve got to stop obsessing about individual liberty and think more about the Common Good.”
” . . . the State is absolute, individuals and groups relative.”
The Democrat party believes victim status trumps the rule of law. Transgenderes threatening Ben Shaprio; supposedly threatened women on campus; illegal immigrants, etc.
Get the press to rally and create a victimized group and voila! all laws go out the door.
What caught my attention was Oduolowu labeling Jenner rich and white, what’s race got to do with it?
As for Shapiro and Tur, He was deliberately causing offense, she retaliated with a threat that no one there, including Shapiro, took seriously. I try not to go around deliberately offending people because it can get you more than threats.
As for Shapiro and Tur, He was deliberately causing offense, she retaliated with a threat that no one there, including Shapiro, took seriously.
But she thought a physical threat to a spoken offense a perfectly appropriate response. If you agree, you just might be a fascist, too.
Well, when Buzz Aldrin punched that dickhead for calling him a fraud and a liar I was cheering Buzz, so maybe that makes me (and Aldrin) fascists in your book.
Well, you know what? If he, or she, or whatever had actually punched him out, he, or she, or whatever he or she is, might have gotten a little more respect. Instead, he, or she, or whatever, called out the fascist mob.
Nonsense, if Tur (she has a name) had actually punched Shapiro you and your Ilk would be screaming even louder.
I will try to explain it to you one more time. He was not “deliberately causing offense.” He was making a point, that one can’t simply decide on one’s own what one’s gender is, and expect everyone else to agree. As to causing offense, yes, the precious snowflake may have been offended but, while he was indifferent as to whether he or she was, that wasn’t (necessarily) his intent. But he made politically incorrect speech, and so he must be punished by the mob.
I will try to explain it to you one more time. He was not “deliberately causing offense.”
I’m pretty sure that’s the first time you’ve made that point.
During the debate Shapiro said “feelings aren’t facts”, a lot like Sheldon would if trying to argue for the application of the laws of the physical world to the human world, now with your “He was not deliberately causing offense” argument, it sounds like Shapiro’s best defense for his offensiveness is that he’s got Aspergers Well it seems to me that Tur could use the same defense, she wasn’t deliberately threatening him, she was just putting a friendly arm around him and trying to explain that she found his comment offensive and that it made her feel angry.
So maybe they’ve both got Asbergers.
it sounds like Shapiro’s best defense for his offensiveness is that he’s got Aspergers
Or (like me) he’s not willing to pervert the language merely to avoid offending someone. Someone is likely to be offended no matter what you do or say. Once you let someone being offended control your behavior, it will never end with these totalitarians, as we’ve seen on campus over the past decades.
And Tur was threatening him, and deliberately so, to intimidate him into compliance. There was nothing “friendly” about it.
It’s the faulty logic Rand displays here that’s responsible for lots of the crap in the world today, that is that physical violence is so terrible a thing to do while emotional abuse and other offensive behaviour intended to hurt the victim is fine and dandy:
A punch in the playgrounds a horrific act, but verbal abuse and cyber bullying is nothing to worry about.
Spanking a naughty child is child abuse (it’s illegal in many countries now) but parents emotionally abusing children goes under the radar.
Corporal punishment of criminals must be outlawed as cruel and inhumane, but locking them up for 10 years in an environment that’ll make them even more antisocial and violent is considered sane.
It’s the faulty logic Rand displays here that’s responsible for lots of the crap in the world today, that is that physical violence is so terrible a thing to do while emotional abuse and other offensive behaviour intended to hurt the victim is fine and dandy
Hilarious. You do realize, of course, that you will probably be one of the first the crocodile eats?
“You do realize, of course, that you will probably be one of the first the crocodile eats?”
“Liberals” (and by “liberals” I mean of course “tax-happy, coercion-addicted, power-tripping State fellators”) never do. In fact, they never seem to get that the crocodile eats anyone. They all seem to delude themselves that Big Brother will somehow spare them,
We used to say, “sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me.” That’s still true. The only power words have over you is the power you lend them.
But, I agree with your last paragraph.
No, I shoot crocodiles, I’m the one who isn’t crying about violence here.
“Nothing outside the State, everything for the State, nothing against the State.”
“We’ve got to stop obsessing about individual liberty and think more about the Common Good.”
” . . . the State is absolute, individuals and groups relative.”
Quick–who said them? Il Duce, Il Dufe or Hillary?