California is currently at their mercy:
Meeting the new target of an 80 percent cut by 2050 would require the use of even more speculative technologies, including those that the CCST reserachers considered to be “in development, not yet available” or merely “research concepts.”
Yet such problems do not seem to impinge much on Sacramento’s political class. Any group willing, as is most egregiously the case with the Latino caucus, to wage war on their own people, are not going to worry too much about such subtleties.
So then, who wins? It’s certainly not the environment, but some of the oligarchs in Silicon Valley may benefit as they have been feeding at the renewable-energy trough at the expense of less-well-off ratepayers. Then there’s the whole bureaucracy, and their academic allies, who can enjoy profitable employment by dreaming up new ways to make life in California more expensive and difficult for average citizens – envisioning schemes that the taxpayers have to finance. And, certainly, the climate change agenda could benefit multifamily housing builders, who will seek to force often-unwilling Californians into residences in which most would rather not spend their lives.
At some point, people are going to get fed up, but we don’t seem to be close yet.
Apparently Bill Nye is still at it …
http://www.nj.com/education/2015/05/bill_nye_talks_climate_change_racial_conflict_at_r.html
Bill Nye says:
So Bill, get to work? Doing what specifically? Going all out nuclear? How about we focus just on lowering your standard of living as a start? I suggest readers check into the carbon footprint of most renewables. And not just to cost of operation and the need for baseline load backup but from installation to end-of-life.
We need more careful thought, less grandstanding…
I read the Variety review for Tomorrowland. Besides a Disney advertisement, the movie seems to be another warning like The Day After Tomorrow, although probably not as poorly done. It is Climate Change Church propaganda with a side serving of more propaganda, and it’s aimed at children.
That’d be the First Church Of Climatology.
“At some point, people are going to get fed up, but we don’t seem to be close yet.”
People just don’t fit the pieces of the puzzle together. They don’t think stuff like this has any cost. They just don’t connect the fall in their fortunes to the rising regulations and out of control government spending. They focus on the scapegoat du jour, of which the major media always have a ready supply.