People’s lives are at stake because of a leftist agenda. From the article:
Once such group that voiced support for the most recent guidelines was the National Alliance for Nutrition and Activity, which is a subsidiary of the group Center for Science in the Public Interest.
When I went to CSPI’s website, I found this article:
Can we sue the Center for Science in the Public Interest for ruining the health of millions of Americans? What’s the difference between “big tobacco” and “big environmentalism”?
I’ve long advocated that many of the big environmental groups need to be investigated for possible charges under the RICO statutes.
“Nice development project you have there. It’d be a shame if anything bad happened to it, such as protests dragging out the environmental impact assessment for years. Tell you what, give us a lot of money and we won’t make trouble for you.”
The irony is that the same Eco-nuts who advocate eating bugs as “sustainable and nutritious” will turn around and bitch about the shrimp farms.
People’s lives are at stake because of a leftist agenda. From the article:
When I went to CSPI’s website, I found this article:
http://www.nutritionaction.com/daily/what-not-to-eat/do-cows-cause-global-warming/
Can we sue the Center for Science in the Public Interest for ruining the health of millions of Americans? What’s the difference between “big tobacco” and “big environmentalism”?
I’ve long advocated that many of the big environmental groups need to be investigated for possible charges under the RICO statutes.
“Nice development project you have there. It’d be a shame if anything bad happened to it, such as protests dragging out the environmental impact assessment for years. Tell you what, give us a lot of money and we won’t make trouble for you.”
The irony is that the same Eco-nuts who advocate eating bugs as “sustainable and nutritious” will turn around and bitch about the shrimp farms.