…are trying to “bamboozle” folks, says the guy who said we could keep our doctors and plans.
22 thoughts on “Republicans”
Comments are closed.
…are trying to “bamboozle” folks, says the guy who said we could keep our doctors and plans.
Comments are closed.
Will somebody please turn off the chief bamboozler’s damned microphone?
Does anyone other than his bootlickers really care what this idiot has to say anymore? Seriously, who listens to the guy?
You answered your own question, bootlickers. He has sky high approval ratings from his base, or as Obama’s ACA architect calls them, idiots.
Amazing how Obama is able to directly attack the GOP at every turn, but won’t speak ill of the terrorists who behead, harvest organs from, and burn alive completely innocent folks.
Directly attack them at every turn but then claim everyone else has a civility problem.
I could direct you toward Obama’s speeches “speaking ill” of ISIS but actions speak louder than words:
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2014/11/26/us-coalition-executes-more-than-1000-airstrikes-against-isis.html
You can discuss why there is or isn’t even more such bombing, but I think it is silly to complain about not “speaking ill of the terrorists” when Obama is ordering the military to kill the same terrorists.
Unless they’re in Syria.
There have been US airstrikes in Syria all but three days this month, including every day since February 9th:
http://www.defense.gov/home/features/2014/0814_iraq/Airstrikes6.html
(The link has “2014” in the url, but it was updated today and nearly every day.)
Noise for the masses. Time and time and time again he says some words – though always stopping short – and then does nothing. This whole summit he had just this past week was a facade…a show for gullibles like you.
He contradicts himself endlessly and you gullibles lap it up.
He’ll claim we MUST move in Libya because people are dying and we can’t just sit around but when more people are dying by hugely greater factors than in Libya…when women are raped and sold into sexual slavery, when christians are beheaded, or set afire, when whole villages are being wiped out or enslaved, when children are being mangles and butchered and abused…..
We get some mild pap from Obama and a few paltry bombing missions.
Actions speak louder than words and what his actions tell us is:
1) He doesn’t mind knowingly contradicting himself because he knows you’ll refuse to think critically
2) He says things and does things for political facade-effect. Not to be really seriously effective in dealing with the problem.
3) He will create false problems – like all this time wasting on whether the Islamist Terrorists are Islamist Terrorists….who cares? Call them Kumquats if you want.
BUT GET RID OF THEM!!!!!!
4) His puppet-minions will wring their hands that the root cause of all this is lack of jobs, when any sensible person knows that’s hogwash.
But you’ll continue to try and tell us that we are nto seeing what we are seeing. Fortunately we are not as stupid as you and Obama think.
This whole summit he had just this past week was a facade…a show for gullibles like you.
I think it’s worse than that. His use of the phrase “violent extremism” is very conveniently vague and open-ended. He could direct it at anybody, say the “extremists” who take the Constitution and the Second Amendment seriously.
Hell, even the First Amendment “extremists” who willfully engage in hate speech against Islam.
Heh, too late. Obama and the Democrats have been using the word extremists to describe Republicans for a long time now. One has to wonder if choosing to use that word to describe ISIS and AQ is a deliberate strategy to associate the GOP with these groups.
It is a lot like how the word climate change denier sprung forth from the intention to link skeptics with holocaust deniers.
And it isn’t so far fetched when you consider Democrats have been calling the Tea Party the American Taliban for years.
Obama has his hard and soft power mixed up. Soft power works at home not abroad. He should act like a total bag of dicks to ISIS and not Republicans.
I could direct you toward Obama’s speeches…
Of course you can Bob,but do you know why? Because one master level skill Obama has is to speak out of both sides of his mouth. Take any position and you can probably find Obama saying something suggestive of it. He’s a politician. He takes advantage of the lefts inability to distinguish between 1 or 2 and a million.
But his actions speak louder. America’s enemies have never in our history had a better friend.
Here’s another example:
So now the Obama administration announces…ANNOUNCES!!!!!! that an offensive to re-take Mosul is going to happen soon.
wtf? WTF?!?!?!?!??! W…..T…..FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF?!?!?!?!?!
You don’t ANNOUNCE that..you DO it!
Announcing means more enemy preparation and more lives lost in the attack….if they make the attack at all.
But Obama doesn’t care about doing…doesn’t care about success in taking Mosul. He just wants the brownie points for saying he’s going to do something.
In fact it wouldn’t surprise me if the attack never come soff or the attack ends 20 minutes after it starts with some token shooting…just to say something was done…
for the gullibles to lap up.
Perhaps actual treason… I’m thinking of the movie where Morgan Freeman tells the guys in the copter that the bomb run will fail if they stay in front of the plane.
The Israeli newspapers announced (or predicted, whatever you want to call it) the attack on Mosul quite a few weeks ago. (I’ll try to find the links) They watched shipments come into Iraq. This is going to be a big attack. I’m not a military guy, but I guess this is too big to hide.
This isn’t the article I’m thinking of, but here you go, from December 2014:
http://www.timesofisrael.com/us-stockpiles-material-ahead-of-major-anti-is-offensive/
All you’ve done is to show that the administration spilled the beans even earlier giving the bad guys even mor etime to prepare.
You think that helps?????
And this isn’t the first time either…think back to Afghanistan when Obama announced a troop increase AND a date of withdrawl.
You don’t ANNOUNCE that
Remember just a week ago, the Obama Administration asked for a new AUMF which banned ground troops and would end in 3 years. Obama wanted to make sure ISIS knew what wasn’t on the table.
They have been talking about this offensive for a long time. This is the plan that has been in the works since Obama was forced to act by a public enraged to learn what ISIS was doing in Iraq.
I don’t know if saying the offensive will happen soon really matters when everyone already knows there was going to be an offensive and that it was going to happen in the near future.
Its been what, a couple of years now, that ISIS has controlled Mosul? They have already had enough time to prepare.
Desert Shield was put in place to protect Saudi Arabia from Iraq’s expansionist desires after they invaded Kuwait. Then we gave Iraq a withdrawl deadline. When they didn’t comply with the deadline, we didn’t give them an extension, we started Desert Storm. And we didn’t start it by piddling around with limited drone strikes, we went full “shock and awe”, before Shock and Awe was officially a term.
It’s one thing to take the time to create a plan to ensure the effectiveness of a campaign. It’s another thing to constantly prevaricate and announce “imminent plans” to do something and never follow up. A threat of force is only as good as the will to use it.
Said the guy who’s doing what he said 22 times he couldn’t do. Legally.