I’m pretty sure this is a first.
I should note, I really don’t “worship” Branson. I have a lot of problems with him. My piece was more of a reaction to Kluger’s bashing than a defense of him per se.
I’m pretty sure this is a first.
I should note, I really don’t “worship” Branson. I have a lot of problems with him. My piece was more of a reaction to Kluger’s bashing than a defense of him per se.
Comments are closed.
“One argument here might be that, as a nonprofit and government-run project, NASA’s institutional culture is more inclined towards care and throughtfulness [sic], while private firms might be more reckless under the comparatively “dynamic” pressures of profits and the market.”
Killing customers is bad for business. If it’s not one of the Ferengi Rules of Acquisition, it should be.
The crews of Apollo One, Challenger, and Columbia are unavailable for comment.
Leftists only understand the ad hominem and straw man. If you are supporting someone’s work, they assume you are enraptured by a cult of personality. If you are against someone’s work, then you must be on a crusade against that person.
Have you praised Branson beyond the general support for civilian space efforts? Then again this is ThinkProgress making the claim and straw man arguments should be expected.
I’m not generally a big fan of ThinkProgress, but really, their only crime here (and it was minimal) was identifying me as a conservative. It really was a nice round up of thoughts from the other side. Kudos to them for doing this sort of thing, as far as I’m concerned.
It’s interesting how a person’s opinions or conclusions are judged (by some) on the basis of their political views rather than the soundness of their arguments.
Yes, that ThinkProgress column is actually quite nice. Does anybody know offhand of a corresponding one from the right?