A claim of executive privilege for a cabinet member’s wife? Really? With a straight face?
[Update a few minutes later]
Here‘s the story at the Washington Examiner.
A claim of executive privilege for a cabinet member’s wife? Really? With a straight face?
[Update a few minutes later]
Here‘s the story at the Washington Examiner.
Comments are closed.
With a straight face?
To be fair, these were documents sent to Tom Fitton, who claimed with a straight face that the federal government has a secret archive of all its email messages. Funny how we haven’t heard any more about that amazing discovery.
You might be right. You might be wrong. I’ll admit I’m wrong if it doesn’t happen to be true.
Unlike you, who has never admitted he’s wrong about anything.
I would like to see the emails with Holder discussing PR strategy using the violence in Mexico as justification for banning guns in the USA. That is exactly what the Obama administration was doing. Hillary, Obama, Holder, and others were constantly doing this in speeches. Holder habitually colludes with Democrats in the media, sometimes even non-profit media groups, to push his PR agenda. It is a little suspicious that the F&F program created the type of violence used on the campaign trial as the reason for banning guns.
And in typical Democrat fashion, opposition to banning guns was framed as being racist toward Mexicans. Democrats showed how much they really cared about Mexicans by running guns for cartels and using their suffering for petty politics.
I would like to see the emails with Holder discussing PR strategy using the violence in Mexico as justification for banning guns in the USA. That is exactly what the Obama administration was doing.
Evidently you don’t need to see the emails, because you already know what they say.
I seem to have missed the Obama initiative to ban guns in the US. Was that before or after he signed bills to allow guns in national parks and on Amtrak?
“I seem to have missed the Obama initiative to ban guns in the US. ”
Really? You don’t remember Obama, Hillary, and Holder talking about how we need to stop the flow of guns into Mexico? Wow…
“Evidently you don’t need to see the emails, because you already know what they say.”
No one knows what they say because the most transparent person in the history of the human race refuses to let the sun shine on his administration. It is well known that Holder works PR campaigns with groups like Media Matters and his office recently tried to leak IRS documents to Democrat politicians and reporters. Why would F&F be any different than what his normal routine is?
You don’t remember Obama, Hillary, and Holder talking about how we need to stop the flow of guns into Mexico?
Can you tell the difference between banning guns in the US and stopping the flow of guns into Mexico?
As a newly-minted far Left Progressivist, I have to bow down to my master, Comrade Jim. Obama signed a bill allowing passengers on Amtrak to check guns in their luggage. The same as airplane passengers have always been able to do. But Comrade Jim makes it seem like this is a major advance for gun rights, when it is nothing of the sort. I applaud your success at disinformation, Comrade Jim! Maybe some day I will be able to do as well…
What does your comment have to do with the post, Mr Alinsky?
My comment, and the post, are about Tom Fitton and people saying things with a straight face.
What does it have to do with Holder’s wife? Or is this just distraction?
The emails to Holder’s wife were demanded by Tom Fitton (president of Judicial Watch).
That doesn’t cover them by executive privilege.
Jim, perhaps you are not the one to comment on people saying things with straight faces. How many times have you been spreading Obama’s lies with a straight face only to be contradicted the next day by Obama? Too many to count. Must suck to continually get stabbed in the back by Obama and the Democrats.
The emails to Holder’s wife were demanded by Tom Fitton (president of Judicial Watch).
Still, that has nothing to do with Fitton’s other claim. It is not relevant in any which way except for you to twist the argument.
I’m unclear. If Eric’s emails are subject to executive privilege does it matter who he wrote them to? If his wife’s emails are those of a supposed private citizen, does anyone have the right to see them? Understand I think the whole lot of them should be shot for treason rather than just imprisoned. Prison is way too kind to them.