They don’t care about the real rape cultures, in Rotherham (and the Muslim world in general).
[Update a while later]
It’s not just the “feminist” left. The Grey Lady has a bias, too:
Ever since the story about the horrific and widespread sex abuse in Rotherham broke, pundits have scrambled for an explanation as to how crimes on that scale could continue unchecked for so long. Yesterday the NYT released a story on Rotherham that at least reached for an explanation. But though the NYT notes both the ethnicity of the abusers and British officials’ “fear of being accused of racism,” as Dawn Eden points out on the Get Religion site, the article conspicuously fails to mention religion. . . .
To understand how crazy this is, think about how the NYT would have covered this story if a ring of Catholic priests had been responsible—or even Catholics otherwise involved in the church. Not only would the story mention the religious angle, but we would see a slew of op-eds condemning Christian theology itself for creating the abuse and calling for changes to that theology. This is a clear sign of bias, albeit not necessarily conscious or malicious, at work. The NYT is so wrapped in its own ideology that its readers don’t get the straight story.
This story points to the problem of Muslim integration in Europe (and elsewhere). Policy elites have authorized mass immigration without much public discussion or consent, and the cultures and values aren’t mixing well (exacerbated by horrible economic problems in much of Europe, thanks also to the elite’s euro fiasco). These factors combine to create a potentially explosive situation on the ground. Readers of the Times won’t understand this very well and will miss one of the key issues driving European, and therefore world, politics.
There is only one religion that it is politically correct to criticize. Well, OK, Jews can be fair game, too.
It’s not just the “feminist” left.
I learn something new every day. I was unaware that ‘leftist’ and ‘feminist’ weren’t interchangeable descriptions of the same group of people. Not saying that the meanings of the terms are identical, just the overlap when the set of folks so labeled are depicted using a Venn diagram.
No, there are libertarian feminists. Christina Hoff Sommers distinguishes between what she calls “equality feminists” and “gender feminists,” with the latter referring to the leftists.
Actually I think the explanation is simple, and it’s racism (please hear me out).
“Other cultures are to be respected.” This is a mantra from the left, no matter whether it’s holistic medicine from China or arranged marriages in India. Other cultures and their “norms”, who are “we” to judge their lives?
For the left it’s looking down upon from a high tower. “Oh those precious (insert novel group of the moment name here)… They live their lives how their ancestors have for over a thousand years. Who are “we” to tell them any different.” Yeah, while our children die of cholera and respiratory illnesses, you prevent continents like Africa from getting things like reliable electricity and clean water…
It’s like a cultural version of “The Truman Show”, the world watches while you bravely live your lives in ignorance and squalor. “Dirt floors” are so envious…until the rains come and you can’t leave the house to get your macchiato.
The ONLY issue that seems to be immune to this is female circumcision. But I think that’s mostly for the squirming part of it, which is difficult to ignore.
Everybody and every thing should be open to criticism (critical thought.) But it’s not about thinking or reason, it’s about demonizing, dehumanizing and humiliation to take power.
It’s war we do not ask for and should be fought in the Jacksonian manner, complete annihilation.