…would be make Richard Nixon look like a saint:
Coming after the failed presidencies of George W. Bush and Barack Hussein Obama, a second “Clinton presidency” would be disastrous, not just because they would resume their practice of selling off anything of value for their political expediency – as they did with the Communist Chinese, with pardons, Commerce Department trade missions seats, overnight stays in the White House’s Lincoln Bedroom, judgeships, commissionerships, Cabinet secretary spots and anything else under their control – but because they have no moral compass. For the Clintons, and Bill would undoubtedly be right there at Hillary’s side, anything goes to further their hubris and hungry thirst for power. And, while they are not black Muslim-sympathizers like Obama and his racist comrades, Hillary has a documented certifiable history of taking money from Islamic interests, not just the Communist Chinese. In effect, the entire country would be put up for sale at a Bonnie and Clyde auction to further subjugate the American people to political slavery under their rule.
Yes. She is much more corrupt than Nixon ever dreamed of being.
” after the failed presidencies of George W. Bush”
Funny you would allow that to be said.
It’s only funny to morons who think that I’m a big fan of George W. Bush.
The funny thing is that the same people who think Bush was the worst President ever and deserved to be thrown in jail and/or executed, think that Obama is the best President ever and that not only is Obama above criticism for any of his misdeeds but that his victims deserved what they got. Just shows how disingenuous the attacks on Bush have been.
The really funny part is that even many of those on the anti-war left now see just how hypocritical most of the left have been; bombing other countries was bad when Bush did it, but it’s wonderful when the Peace Prize President does it.
That’s what happens when your political organization is just a collection of otherwise unrelated special interest groups who couldn’t care less about each other beyond short-term political expediency.
Pffft! Political parties are just ersatz tribes…very ersatz…
I like the President, I don’t love all of his policy.
I give OCare a C+ and his Energy Policy a B+, the rest is pretty sad.
Why a C+? Just curious.
Things i like about Obamacare.
1) it did start the idea of nationwide electronic health records
2) Medicare QoS, guidelines and evidence-based medicine.
Things to dislike about Obamacare
Too slow implementation.
It didn’t let Medicare and Medicaid bid for best price pharmaceuticals.
it would have been better to expand medicare, and let private insurance
be the Medicare supplemental plans. Bang, everyone is Medicare eligible.
Bang, adjust the FICA to cover it. Bang you want better, buy a supplemental
plan.
Instead Obamacare is Romneycare XL. Far too complex for what could have been
simple.
Funny that DN wants others to see in him that which he is absolutely unable to comprehend about Rand.
“The funny thing is that the same people who think Bush was the worst President ever and deserved to be thrown in jail and/or executed, think that Obama is the best President ever . . .”
That alone would qualify them for moron-hood, wodun.
I believe Obama made a fundamental mistake embracing the Bush foreign policy.
He kept troops in Afghanistan, he pursued intervention in the Middle East,
He pushed an overarching security state TSA -> NSA.
Drone strikes,
“And, while they are not black Muslim-sympathizers like Obama and his racist comrades,”
Ha ha ha! That sentence fragment was written like an unfair leftwing caricature of, well, many of you. (That was a backhanded compliment.)
“Muslim-sympathizers” doesn’t even make sense, but tell me, what is the adjective “black” doing in that sentence? Is the author saying “while they aren’t black, they are still pretty bad?” Or is he suggesting that Obama only “sympathizes” with black Muslims?
Bob, I feel generous and will help you with your admitted problem in reading comprehension. In the sentence, “they” refers to the Clintons. The Clintons are being compared conversely to “black Muslim-sympathizers”. Further, the author clearly identifies to the reader an example of what is a “black Muslim-sympathizer” by using the comparative term “like”. Thus if you read the sentence logically, “Barack Obama is a black Muslim-sympathizer and the Clintons are not black Muslim-sympathizers” is the concept the author wants you to comprehend. Although it was not one of your limited options for understanding, this suggest the term “black” is a reference to Obama’s skin color. Glad I could help you and kudos for admitting your problem. That bold step on your part was an encouragement to provide you assistance.
“after the failed presidencies of George W. Bush and Barack Hussein Obama”
Makes the Clinton Administration seem kind of nice.
Except for all the corruption and abuse of women, and setting the stage for 911.