The article is mistaken in one small aspect; it wasn’t a “largely unseen video”. That now-famous video has been played repeatedly *on TV* in Egypt shortly before the Cairo embassy was sacked. That’s state-run TV, and that gets to the true root of the issue; the government was Muslim Brotherhood thanks to Obama, and deliberately aided Al Qauda’s operation via running the video to stir up violence (what other explanation is there for running an anti-islamic youtube video on TV? Under their usual rules, it’s blasphemy).
Now fit those facts with the known timeline; The embassy tweeted an apology for the video well before the sacking, but while the embassy was under evacuation (in anticipation of these supposedly spontaneous riots!). The reason the embassy (or state department) decided to apologize for the video was the fact is was running on local TV in Cairo.
So, the government Obama put in power was acting against us to help Al Qaueda. That’s a huge part of the “why” of this cover-up.
The article is mistaken in one small aspect; it wasn’t a “largely unseen video”. That now-famous video has been played repeatedly *on TV* in Egypt shortly before the Cairo embassy was sacked. That’s state-run TV, and that gets to the true root of the issue; the government was Muslim Brotherhood thanks to Obama, and deliberately aided Al Qauda’s operation via running the video to stir up violence (what other explanation is there for running an anti-islamic youtube video on TV? Under their usual rules, it’s blasphemy).
Now fit those facts with the known timeline; The embassy tweeted an apology for the video well before the sacking, but while the embassy was under evacuation (in anticipation of these supposedly spontaneous riots!). The reason the embassy (or state department) decided to apologize for the video was the fact is was running on local TV in Cairo.
So, the government Obama put in power was acting against us to help Al Qaueda. That’s a huge part of the “why” of this cover-up.