“The Duke Ai asked, saying, ‘What should be done in order to secure the submission of the people?’ Confucius replied, ‘Advance the upright and set aside the crooked, then the people will submit. Advance the crooked and set aside the upright, then the people will not submit.'”
Sage advice that is ignored by black democrats who are antigun but pro-gang member. This advice is a warning to those who use government to protect the gangs, the taxpayer will eventually stop submitting.
Can’t get what they want if they let everyone know what their true intentions are. Just like Obamacare.
It really bothers me when a person on my side of an argument lowers himself to the dishonesty of the other side.
“Yes, you are out there seeking to ban all guns.” So what does the movement want, and why does this barrier exist? … We do think that there should be a ban on assault weapons…
Wow. The NRA is ginning up fear of gun bans to prevent Aborn’s agenda… and then Aborn said that gun bans are part of the agenda.
I don’t think the speaker was being at all disingenuous, he clearly wanted to make the distinction between “all guns” and some guns, he wasn’t hiding his agenda although the writer wants to pretend that he was.
What, a ban isn’t a ban if it isn’t all-inclusive? Who knew?
Thanks for clearing that up, Dr. d. Sadsack! Such a clear and cutting reply!
Confucius on anarcho tyranny:
Sage advice that is ignored by black democrats who are antigun but pro-gang member. This advice is a warning to those who use government to protect the gangs, the taxpayer will eventually stop submitting.
Can’t get what they want if they let everyone know what their true intentions are. Just like Obamacare.
It really bothers me when a person on my side of an argument lowers himself to the dishonesty of the other side.
“Yes, you are out there seeking to ban all guns.” So what does the movement want, and why does this barrier exist? … We do think that there should be a ban on assault weapons…
Wow. The NRA is ginning up fear of gun bans to prevent Aborn’s agenda… and then Aborn said that gun bans are part of the agenda.
I don’t think the speaker was being at all disingenuous, he clearly wanted to make the distinction between “all guns” and some guns, he wasn’t hiding his agenda although the writer wants to pretend that he was.
What, a ban isn’t a ban if it isn’t all-inclusive? Who knew?
Thanks for clearing that up, Dr. d. Sadsack! Such a clear and cutting reply!