…would be better off in LA:
Rather than an offense against art, a properly structured sale would represent a public-spirited update of how the art came to Detroit and other U.S. cities in the first place: as a way of providing liquidity to Europeans in need of cash. “The second world war has opened up an opportunity such as may never come again,” the DIA’s director wrote unabashedly in 1948. “Great private collections which have been held intact for a hundred years or more are being broken up.” Detroit is like an aristocratic estate forced to adjust to changing times. It can’t marry an heiress, but it might find some lucratively appreciative new homes for some of its heirlooms.
This is the just consequence of terrible voters’ decision and awful city management.
Hmm, I think the fine people of Detroit would rather cut off one of their ears than sell their van Gogh.
No one feels sorry for a millionaire who goes bankrupt and has to sell his art collection.
Unless the millionaire happens to be a government.