5 thoughts on “Osama’s Plot To Destroy America”

  1. I can’t quite recall the point when Obama jumped the shark for me, but selecting Biden as Veep was a serious contender.

  2. While I can’t stand Obama, I’d gladly take a bullet for him. To me, three of the scariest words in the English language would be “President Joe Biden.” The man is a complete and total moron.

    And to think, the same people who complained that Sarah Palin wasn’t qualified for the Vice Presidency somehow believe that Joe Biden is.

    1. Yes, but were it a forced choice between voting for Mr. Obama and Mr. Biden, I am certain how I would vote. I disagree with your assessment that Vice President is completely foolish. I think not only possible but documented that one can be more foolish than he.

  3. One of the many complete fails in the Republican 2008 campaign was letting the MSM propagate the easily countered canard that gaff prone plagiarist Biden was a capable VP. Could have gotten a 2-fer touting Pailn’s experience in state exec branch vs Obama’s voting “present” in the Illinois senate. The RNC and McCain ran an awful campaign. I don’t see any likely improvement this time.

  4. The al-Qaeda brand had become a problem, Bin Laden explained, because Obama administration officials “have largely stopped using the phrase ‘the war on terror’ in the context of not wanting to provoke Muslims,” and instead promoted a war against al-Qaeda.

    What a twisted pile of tripe. Yeah David, the “Obama administration’s” decision to stop saying “war on terror” was a pivotal public relations victory. See?? And… it had the additional benefit of not provoking Muslims.

    My neck hurts.

    Adam Gadahn, a U.S.-born media adviser, even discussed in a message to his boss what would be the best television outlets for a bin Laden anniversary video.

    “It should be sent for example to ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN and maybe PBS and VOA. As for Fox News let her die in her anger,” Gadahn wrote. At another point, he said of the networks: “From a professional point of view, they are all on one level — except (Fox News) channel, which falls into the abyss as you know, and lacks objectivity, too.”

    Wonder if anything was left out of that. Seems like the NYT and… ohhh… the Washington Post would fit right in there.

    You guys should get together and make an ad: “Watch us, we’re endorsed… all over. And you won’t run the risk of falling into an abyss.”

Comments are closed.