So, now we just have to … start typing, very fast!
Godspeed.
If the grammar of the second paragraph is any indication of the quality of the book, I’ll pass.
You think they will have no editors? That seems like a strange reason to avoid a book.
I don’t think we’re in 2.0 anymore….we’ve sunk all the way to Vista.
It’s not called the ME generation for nothing, but at least it’s not Bob.
Good idea, but the system architecture, based on the LockeSoft/Jefferson 1776RepGov processor, never did work well, and simply can’t handle the increased processing load of today’s OS. The solution is not bigger, better software; it is to discard the CPU paradigm altogether and return to the traditional idea of independent, networked mini-systems, each running its own OS on the processor best suited to its unique environment. Kludge x kludge = KLUDGE.
Wasn’t the Articles of Confederation a beta release?
Up with libertarian distributed computing on massive peer-to-peer networks, and down with evil centralized, fascistic cloud computing.
In other words, widely decentralized open source government. All the Feds should do is be the IEEE and set the comunications standard, not the content.
I’ve had some slight contact with standards committees–I’m pretty sure you don’t want to cross a standards committee with the federal government.
It’s my impression that the same kind of people who gravitate to standards committees also want to run local home owners associations. In other words, petty fascists.
I see. So a government standards committee would allow the petty fascists to go pro?
Godspeed.
If the grammar of the second paragraph is any indication of the quality of the book, I’ll pass.
You think they will have no editors? That seems like a strange reason to avoid a book.
I don’t think we’re in 2.0 anymore….we’ve sunk all the way to Vista.
It’s not called the ME generation for nothing, but at least it’s not Bob.
Good idea, but the system architecture, based on the LockeSoft/Jefferson 1776RepGov processor, never did work well, and simply can’t handle the increased processing load of today’s OS. The solution is not bigger, better software; it is to discard the CPU paradigm altogether and return to the traditional idea of independent, networked mini-systems, each running its own OS on the processor best suited to its unique environment. Kludge x kludge = KLUDGE.
Wasn’t the Articles of Confederation a beta release?
Up with libertarian distributed computing on massive peer-to-peer networks, and down with evil centralized, fascistic cloud computing.
In other words, widely decentralized open source government. All the Feds should do is be the IEEE and set the comunications standard, not the content.
I’ve had some slight contact with standards committees–I’m pretty sure you don’t want to cross a standards committee with the federal government.
It’s my impression that the same kind of people who gravitate to standards committees also want to run local home owners associations. In other words, petty fascists.
I see. So a government standards committee would allow the petty fascists to go pro?