Thoughts on the latest collapse of the bunco scheme known as ObamaCare:
To say that this is an embarrassment for the gang in the White House and the Democratic congressional leadership, who we already knew could not shoot straight, would be a gross understatement. The failure of CLASS, predicted by conservatives, sprang from the Democrats’ insistence to pass some “historic” health-care bill, any such bill, and deal with the consequences later. Well, later is now.
Obama lied, the economy died.
[Update a few minutes later]
Did 2008 come true?
The skeptics of 2008 proved prescient; those who demonized them should be embarrassed. And we should remember that candidates, of both parties, will govern mostly as they campaign. Slips are not indiscretions, but often will prove in hindsight windows of the soul.
I was wrong about his electability, but I was right about what a disaster he would be as president. I saw him for what he was, but underestimated how susceptible so many are to con men.
[Update a while later]
Adult leadership comes from the House, not the White House.
It’s been that way since the beginning of the year. And at least now, as opposed to 2008-2010, we have some adult leadership in DC.
[Update a couple minutes later]
One ObamaCare disaster averted, but a lot more to go:
This confirmation that Obamacare cannot in fact defy the laws of mathematics and accounting should serve as a warning regarding the implementation of the broader law, most of which would begin in 2014 if it is not repealed by then. The other major provisions of the statute are also grossly ill-designed. If it is permitted to take effect in full, the law will cause premiums to rise rapidly in the individual market and create major dislocation in the employer market, driving people into vastly overregulated exchanges that would push premiums higher still, and then initiate a program of subsidies whose only real answer to the mounting costs of coverage will be to pay them with public dollars and so inflate them further. It aims to spend a trillion dollars on subsidies to large insurance companies and the expansion of an unreformed Medicaid system, to micromanage the insurance industry in ways likely to make it even less efficient, to cut Medicare benefits without using the money to shore up the program or reduce the deficit, and to raise taxes on employment, investment, and medical research. CBO does not expect it to make a real dent in the inflation of health-care costs or to avert the fiscal implosion of Medicare. Instead, it will double down on price controls and centralized administration and make a real reform of our system much more difficult. These outcomes are nearly as predictable as the fiscal collapse of the CLASS Act (and have been predicted by the same people who saw that the CLASS Act would never work, including the CMS actuary). But in the case of the CLASS Act, the Secretary of HHS was required to certify in advance that her actuaries believed it could be sustained, and at the end of the day there was no way around the fact that it couldn’t. The rest of the law has no such requirements, so the “we tried our best” excuse will come only after disaster strikes.
But other than that, it’s great.
On behalf of the sane residents of the 39th District of California, I’d like to apologize for Rep. Linda Sanchez. She is a douche. Thanks.
There were several of us here who pointed out the fraudulent nature of ObamaCare cost savings during the debate, only to be told by the likes of Chris that CBO scoring was the gold standard of accounting. It was BS then and BS now.
“…spend a trillion dollars on subsidies to large insurance companies…”
Is anyone significant not opposed to that?
But Jim told us that Obamacare would save the economy and bring us closer to a balanced budget!