…by and for stupid people.
Hey, maybe the Obama campaign can hire them. It would be at least as smart as keeping Plouffe and Axelrod.
…by and for stupid people.
Hey, maybe the Obama campaign can hire them. It would be at least as smart as keeping Plouffe and Axelrod.
Comments are closed.
“Hey, maybe the Obama campaign can hire them.”
Um, they DID hire them in 2008. And it worked….
I think Mccain hired them.
Well, some of the stupidest people I ever encountered were MENSA members. It’s from them I learned that there are some monumental stupidities of which only genius is capable.
Then from Obama I learned that mere stupidity is capable of a lot, too.
No, Stupid’s questions come from the tiresome adolescent predicate that believes ignorance is necessary for innovation. If you don’t know anything, you’ll come up with something totally new!
Heh. Sounds like it could be the corporate motto for SpaceX 😉 (How many times have advocates here argued that SpaceX’s liberation from NASA’s dusty old folklore and “cargo cult” superstitions will usher in a new era of innovation?)
How many times have advocates here argued that SpaceX’s liberation from NASA’s dusty old folklore and “cargo cult” superstitions will usher in a new era of innovation?
None, that I know of. My recollection is that people have argued that SpaceX’s liberation from having to spread jobs all over hell’s half acre and to use conventional procurement mechanisms and subcontractors will usher in a new era of innovation. And it seems to have worked, at least in terms of costs.
Pity the academic left.
They spend decades developing a edifice of reasoning dedicated to blurring the distinction between easily distinguished quantities (rape and calculus, George Washington and terrorists, Eichmann and people going to work on Tuesday, …) and here it’s being used to blur the distinction between intelligence and stupidity… to sell blue jeans.
What’s a commie to do?