There has been a bombing and terrorist attack in Oslo, Norway.
Anyone want to make book on what the religion was of the people who did it? Or that when it’s revealed, the chin pullers in the media will tie themselves into knots trying to figure out why they’d do such a thing, and that it must be just a sad coincidence?
[Update a few minutes later]
Here’s more from ABC News. We can be sure that these tragic events had nothing to do with this:
Earlier this month, a Norwegian prosecutor filed terrorism charges against an Iraqi-born cleric who had allegedly threatened the lives of Norwegian politicians. Mullah Krekar, the founder of the Kurdish Islamist group Ansar al-Islam, said in a news conference in 2010 that if he was deported from Norway he would be killed and, therefore, Norwegian politicians deserved the same fate, according to an AP report. The Norwegian government had considered deporting Krekar because he was seen as a national security threat.
I mean, that would just be crazy talk.
[Update at noon]
Twenty to twenty-five dead at a youth camp.
Barbarians. Actually, that’s an insult to barbarians.
What kind of weekend are you going to have that a simple statement of fact “set you up for it”?
The kind where I’m going to think about what you said at about 15:00 Sunday while I’m mowing the lawn and really chuckle while I haul the lawn mower up the 50 degree incline of my front lawn because I can’t believe you said that and actually believe it’s relevant.
Oh, and, reading the news… yeah, those Lutherans… scary dudes… I guess he might not be a Christian, but it doesn’t much look like he’s a Muslim.
Retraction Rand?
Thought not.
I bought some popcorn so I can enjoy this weekend’s Republican bloodletting too, because if the polls stay this way it’s going to be fun.
Have I mentioned I’m enjoying this?
@wodun – David Copeland in the UK springs to mind. He attacked immigrant areas and a gay pub – ironically killing the straight people drinking there.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Copeland
It’s not unheard of in Europe nor the US.
Of course, I assume that Copeland and all the others are part of the grand plan for a caliphate…
Rand – again, awesome dude. This has been fun.
Keep it up!
why did a jihadist organization claim responsibility
Wow! Let me think about that for about 10 seconds… nah, that was too long.
Seriously… what IS the world like inside your head????
Oh and while I’m on a roll… I’m sure News International/News Corps will have something to make you all feel better. 🙂
Seriously, this has been fun, and I actually do wish I was surprised at this thread.
Amazingly, the shooter may indeed be a violent Lutheran. The police are describing him as a Christian fundamentalist.
“Have I mentioned I’m enjoying this?”
Disgusting. Several people have been murdered. What’s wrong with you?
“Bill, defense against what? Against jumping to conclusions?”
No Bob, the liberal trope that the “right wing” is just as bad as the Islamists. You can’t be this obtuse unless it’s willful.
Retraction Rand?
What is it that I need to retract? Having trouble reading again?
Have I mentioned I’m enjoying this?
Yes, you’ve demonstrated your illness in the past. No need to remind us.
Oh, I see, yes, you’re right: I think the “right wing” is only as bad as “the Muslims”, which is to say that the overwhelming majority of them are nice people who I can live alongside, even though many of them (but not all) have screwy ideas. There is no way I would ever think the “right wing” is just as bad as Islamist terrorists, just as I would never think that typical Muslims are just as bad as violent right wing extremists.
Some Muslims believe in democracy, the rule of law, the equality of women (at least to the extent that Catholics do), freedom of religion, and so forth, and some right wingers don’t. Arguing about ratios is silly: it is better to meet people and judge them as individuals.
Bob-1: well written (your 6:31 am).
Far-right violence is nothing new to Europe. The US news media tend to ignore it, after all we have far more fascinating things to cover, like the antics of drunken film stars.
I am very upset that such a wonderful nation has been attacked like this. Norway is a fantastic place. But their society does have quite a few isolated loners (mostly male) and weird stuff does occur.
Nothing this bad, however.
There is a clear political motive in this horror. The Labor government was targeted for assassination, and that youth camp was a political training retreat for young Labor members.
Now we’ll see if another shoe drops, and whether this guy really was a loner, or if this is part of something larger. (No, I’m not claiming that is true. Has to be checked out.)
Topic: 80+ people killed in Norway.
Daveon: AWESOME DUDE! That’s set me up for the weekend!
Daveon: Have I mentioned I’m enjoying this?
Daveon: Rand – again, awesome dude. This has been fun.
Daveon: Seriously, this has been fun
A few years ago, Daveon wished my wife to get cancer. Now he gets excited about the murder of 80 people. Daveon is a fucking sick bastard.
A girl on the island has a blog post.
Cleaned-up the translation a bit:
Have I mentioned I’m enjoying this?
Yes, many times, you sick fuck.
Not only wasn’t the terrorist an Islamist, but he posted on political blogs exactly the sort of anti-multicultralist anti-Muslim screeds found here. His posted comments match comments found here nearly word for word. His actions don’t logically discredit his views (the views many of you share), but there is an irony pertaining to this blog, and I’m quite sure that irony is all Daveon was enjoying.
That word doesn’t mean what you think it means. No one here made any assumption about the identity of the perp(s) that wasn’t first made by the international news services or the Norwegian authorities themselves, nor has anyone here (with the possible exception of Dave) advocated or cheered-on terrorism.
And I’m quite sure he’s still a sickening asshole. And that the world would be a better place if his lawn mower slipped down his front lawn and landed on him.
Not only wasn’t the terrorist an Islamist
I guess you taught us all a lesson there bob. The next time there is a bombing we’ll immediately reject the idea that jihad has anything to do with it.
And obviously if Norway had a greater population of muslims none of this would have happened.
What is it that I need to retract?
How about:
It’s no coincidence, and he’s no convert.
Actually, since all the news we’re getting is coming from the oh-so-accurate-and-impartial professional news media, I think we should take anything that’s being “reported” about the interests and activities of the suspect with a grain of salt. The lesson about jumping to conclusions (I mean, this just happened yesterday) goes both ways. Right now, the only thing that is certain, is a bunch of people were murdered, and they have a suspect in custody with blond hair.
Well I am going on record as being extremely angry as this sick bastard that perpetrated this atrocity and I 100% denounce his nationalist ideals, bigoted attitudes, and most importantly his murderous actions. Whatever it is that he may have said or the opinions he expressed as a “nationlist” or whatever have no bearing whatsoever on the principles of which I believe in which are: the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Any person, no matter how they have self described or label themselves politically losses all credence either way once they commit murder and purposefully defy the rights imbued to man by nature and God. This insane man is not a right winger/conservative/libertarian in my mind. He lost that privilege the moment this sick scheme even popped into his head. And unlike many Muslims who refuse to denounce the violently fanatical aspects of Islam or the leftists who continually find excuses for an ideology that has massacred millions; I say this guy should be punished to the fullest extent of the law, exiled to the North Pole with nothing but his underwear and a can of tuna (no opener), and forever more used as a poster child of precisely what a so called “right-winger” not ought to be.
It’s no coincidence, and he’s no convert.
If that’s all, it’s a pretty trivial retraction. The reasonable working assumption at the time, given the Jihadists’ claims, was that the bombing was their work.
On a tangent, how many lives might have been saved had people been prepared to resist the gunman with deadly force?
…how many lives might have been saved had people been prepared to resist the gunman with deadly force?
I have a new post on that topic.