Time has named the Ares-I the “Invention of the Year“:
TIME’s best invention of the year may send Americans back to the Moon and put the first human on Mars.
Do they even know that it can’t deliver people beyond earth orbit? On the other hand, it is really tall…
This kind of technological illiteracy is pathetic, but it’s what I’ve come to expect from the likes of Time.
[Mid-morning update]
From a reader:
My company was selected for a Time “Invention of the Year.” Hooray, we thought. Then the phone calls from Time started. A bored 20-something with a false Valley girl accent called to talk to the inventor of the thing we had been nominated for. We responded that there was no one person, it was a company-wide effort. It took, and I do not exaggerate, at least 30 minutes to get it through her head that “company” meant “more than one person.” Then the so-called fact checker wanted to know how the one person got the idea for the invention. We patiently explained that it was the company’s job to make such products and that more than one person had contributed to the idea and the building of our nifty little gadget. The fact checker did not know the difference between a pound and a kilogram, had no knowledge of basic chemistry, had never heard of the founders in our field, and didn’t even know what our gadget looked like. Subsequent calls did not remove the impression of careless indifference. Time never did get the story right.
Since that day I have never trusted a single story from Time. Not one. If the writers and editors can’t understand the difference between a pound and a kilogram, what else are they missing?
A lot. It’s a lot easier to just grab a press release from NASA PAO than to have to actually understand what the hell you’re talking about..
[Mid-afternoon update]
More thoughts on the cluelessness of this from Keith Cowing.
Here is a possible explanation:
http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/education/2009/11/12/2009-11-12_cunys_got_math_problem_many_freshmen_from_city_hs_fail_at_basic_algebra.html
Time magazine… toilet paper substitute of the year!
Is it even really an “invention”?
I mean, sure, it’s a new arrangement of rocket parts, but is any particular thing about it all that novel?
…is any particular thing about it all that novel?
It’s really tall, and it looks like a corn dog.
They should have awarded it to the corn dog, even posthumously. The ability to walk around a state fair while eating fried food on a stick must have been the iPhone of its day.
Did the Nobel Committee take over TIME’s Science section?
Interesting contrast with Popular Science’s choice:
http://www.popsci.com/bown/2009/product/spacex-falcon-1
I was impressed by the PopSci citation of the Lung Flute. Low tech, yet brilliant.
The popsci picture is of the Falcon IX yet the article if for the Falcon I.
Rigged demo of the year more like it.
All these comments and I’m the only one that commented on the PopSci website about it?
After all the above, how is it I was the only one to post on the PopSci site that they … ahh … “whooops’d”?
Twice? (called them on the Launch Abort System also).
I can’t help thinking some Ares supporter will find an excuse to read Time’s ‘endorsement’ into the Congressional Record as well…