Today’s scheduled Atlas V launch illustrates one of the problems with a heavy lifter that people fail to recognize. If that launch fails today, we will lose not one, but two lunar science missions critical as a precursor to lunar bases. If they were going on separate rides, we’d have a high level of confidence that at least one would be successful.
If you have a heavy lifter, unless it’s carrying mostly propellant, its payload is going to be hugely expensive, because space hardware tends to cost thousands of dollars per pound to manufacture. It’s an all or nothing throw of the dice, with an expendable vehicle, which will never be reliable in any sane sense of that word. Putting up smaller pieces might increase the chances that one of the pieces doesn’t make it, but you won’t lose billions of dollars on a single launch. And if it’s carrying mostly propellant, there are lots of ways of getting cheap payload up, and propellant is almost infinitely divisible onto smaller vehicles.
Yep, HLVs are mainly good for launching propellant or launching crew to higher-energy orbits. Both are better done with RLVs, but if you’re stuck with an HLV then, ironically, launching people on it is not a bad way to use it…
I don’t think that is a fair characterization of this launch–LCROSS was an afterthought, done on the cheap, as a way to use up a bit of upmass. They came up with a really clever way to use the huge mass of the Centuar.
You are right Blue. This mission is not a good example for the point Rand is making about HLV.