It would be nice to say that I was surprised by Richardson’s…errrr…issues. But I wasn’t.
At all.
For one thing, it was hardly news. But it’s also not like this is anything new. There have been lots of shady behavior and associations with the New Mexico governor, going back to his stint in the Clinton administration. He probably didn’t know why the White House wanted him to find a job for former intern Monica Lewinsky, but unless he was stupid, he had to have figured out (at least after interviewing her) that it wasn’t because she was going to light the UN on fire with her diplomatic skills and encyclopedic knowledge of world affairs (though other types of affairs wouldn’t have been out of the question).
And as I noted a few weeks ago, when a state is characterized by insiders as “Lousiana with chiles,” it’s unlikely that the governor himself isn’t in the thick of the corruption. It also makes one wonder what kinds of deals that Virgin Galactic had to cut, perhaps partly under the table, to get the lease agreement signed. If so, was this really the Great WhiteHispanic Hope for commercial space, in Washington or elsewhere?
Anyway, Jonah Goldberg has some more impressions from his book tour:
With the exception of Bill Clinton, it’s difficult to think of a major politician who has been plagued more persistently by troubling rumors of all sorts. When I was in New Mexico not long ago, it felt like I was visiting Little Rock in the way everyone had a sketchy story, theory or little-known fact. Some was very vague, some of it was clearly over the top, and some of it was quite plausible. My guess, and this is only a guess, is that Obama has dodged a bullet here.
Of course, the question is why did it take so long for the bullet dodging to occur? How did he get the nomination in the first place? Should the president-elect blame it on bad staff again? Why can’t this guy find good help? As a reader at Instapundit writes: “They told me if I voted for McCain, I’d have a President who didn’t properly vet his nominees –- and they were right!”
[Update early afternoon]
Pejman Yousafzadeh has some useful thoughts on a replacement:
The Richardson withdrawal represents a remarkable stumble by a transition process that has been notable until now for its sure-footedness and its ability to garner praise from both Democrats and Republicans for the professionalism of its execution and for the quality of its appointees. It promoted the president-elect to say that Richardson “would have brought to the job of commerce secretary and our economic team great insights accumulated through an extraordinary career in federal and state office,” just before throwing Richardson under the bus. To this comment, my RedState colleague Francis Cianfrocca replies: “That makes me feel wonderful! Hey Mr. Obama, how about picking a Commerce Secretary with great insights accumulated though an extraordinary career in COMMERCE?” It’s not a bad idea. One of the commerce secretary’s responsibilities is to be an advocate for the formulation and implementation of trade policies and nowadays, the political class doesn’t seem to have the first clue how best to conduct trade policy. One would think that with the memory of the misguided Smoot-Hawley tariff — one of the epic fails of the 20th century — still relatively fresh in our minds, we would not veer towards protectionism. And yet, we see that the incoming Obama administration sought to counterbalance the appointment of a pro-free trade United States trade representative in Ron Kirk with the appointment of the anti-free trade — and pro-card check — Hilda Solis to the Labor Department. Given this antediluvian personnel appointment, we need a commerce secretary who has both read and understands the powerful point behind Frederic Bastiat’s most famous parody, but since the president-elect seems determined to choose his commerce secretary from the ranks of government rather than from the ranks of those who actually have firsthand experience with, you know, commerce, I’m not optimistic on this front.
Neither am I. Let’s hope for a surprise.
[Afternoon update]
This CBS report says that Kansas governor Kathleen Sebelius is on the short list to replace him as the nominee. I have no idea what that means for space commerce.
This is why I think Fitz’s indictment of Blago was a shot across the bow to warn the Obama Administration to avoid obviously problematic entanglements. Seems to be working — better that Richardson drop out now than be forced out after a few months in office.
I’m surprised only that it was this that derailed him and not a bimbo eruption.
Ha! It is remarkable to me that when there has been nearly endless praise from the Republicans regarding Obama’s appointments and nominations, starting with Gates and Jones, and including Rahm Emanuel (who is respected by Republican members of congress), Rand Simberg asks “Why can’t this guy find good help?” Generally, people across the political spectrum have had nothing but good things to say about the transition team. I’m amused. Keep up your good work thinking independently!
I think you’re a little confused, Bob. It’s not that we’re thrilled with his picks (at least I’m not). We’re just relieved because we feared much worse.
By the way, the blog looks nice today. I’m sure there was a lot of fiddly finishing work, and it paid off.
Thanks, but there’s still a lot of work to do (like rebuilding the blog roll).
This leaves the Office of Secretary of Commerce-Elect vacant!
What I find interesting is not only has Rand made positive comments about Richardson, but other blogs have noted that Rand has noted positive aspects of Richardson. Yet, the typical lefty gets bent out of shape if Rand then makes a criticism of The One.
Chill out, Bob. You have to make it 4 years. If you can’t handle a little joke now, you are going to be in bad shape when Obama’s honeymoon is over.