I’ll be talking about my NRO piece, NASA, the Shuttle and the future of human spaceflight on the Ron Smith Show this afternoon, a little after 3:30 Eastern.

[Update a few minutes later]

Apparently, just before me, the guest host (Ron Smith is apparently on vacation) is going to be talking to a Matt Towery, who had this “Scuttle the Shuttle” piece at Townhall.com yesterday. It seems a little incoherent to me–it’s not clear what he’s proposing in its place, and the logic doesn’t necessarily hold together:

Experts still refer to the shuttle as an “experimental craft,” one in which the odds of a catastrophic failure — loss of the shuttle or the crew or both — are somewhere between one in 60 and one in 100 launches. Would you get on a conveyance of any kind that had one chance in 60 of killing you?

Well, in general, no. But if I thought that it were my one and only chance of getting into space, I might spin the cartridges on the revolver–it’s ten times better odds than classical Russian roulette, with a heck of a payoff. If not one in sixty, what is the right number?

The Shuttle safety debate often reminds me of the irrationality of the fifty-five-mph speed limit. Or the minimum wage. These people think that there’s some rational basis for their arbitrary numerology, but you can never get them to explain it.