Jim Angle (filling in for Brit Hume today) just did a misleading story about the George Galloway situation. He reported that the Christian Science Monitor was now claiming that the documents they found in Baghdad that supposedly incriminated him were forgeries, which is true. He then went on to say that the Telegraph was sticking by their story. What he failed to point out was that the Telegraph has different documents than the CSM did, and that the same expert who declared the CSM’s forged said that the Telegraph’s appeared genuine. But from the Fox reportage, one might conclude that this was an argument between the Telegraph and the CSM as to whether or not they were forged.

Unfair, though it’s not clear whether or not it’s balanced…